LEV Advisory Group · Tool 2 of 21 · ← Tool 1: AI Opportunity Assessment

Free Hospital AI Tool — LEV Advisory Group

The Hospital
AI Urgency Index

A 2-minute pulse check that scores your organization's AI urgency on a 1–100 scale — producing a board-ready summary you can use immediately.

⏱ 2 minutes 📊 5 dimensions scored 📧 Score appears on screen + emailed to you 🚫 No vendor affiliation
Section 1 of 3 — Urgency dimensions

Section 1 of 3 — The five urgency dimensions

Rate your organization's situation

Select the option that best describes your current reality. Be honest — the score is only as useful as the answers behind it.

Financial pressure Dimension 1 / 5
Margins are severely compressed. Cost reduction is a board-level emergency and we are exploring every lever available.
Critical
Margins are under significant pressure. We are missing financial targets and leadership is actively looking for solutions.
High
We are managing but the trajectory is concerning. Cost pressures are real but not yet at crisis level.
Moderate
Financially stable. We have headroom and are investing for growth rather than cutting for survival.
Low
Strong financial position. AI is a strategic investment opportunity for us, not a financial necessity.
Minimal
Competitive positioning Dimension 2 / 5
We are losing market share to competitors already deploying AI. The gap is visible and growing.
Critical
We know peers are moving aggressively on AI. We feel behind and are concerned about falling further.
High
We are roughly keeping pace with peers. Some competitors are moving faster but we are not significantly behind.
Moderate
We are ahead of most peers. We have a competitive advantage we want to protect and extend.
Low
We are a clear market leader. AI is about extending our advantage, not catching up.
Minimal
Workforce crisis Dimension 3 / 5
Workforce crisis is severe. Heavy agency dependency, acute burnout, and turnover at dangerous levels.
Critical
Significant workforce pressure. Burnout and turnover are above benchmark and we are struggling to maintain adequate staffing.
High
Workforce challenges are real but manageable. We feel the national pressure but are not in crisis.
Moderate
Workforce is relatively stable. Some turnover challenges but nothing threatening operations.
Low
Strong workforce stability. Good retention, adequate staffing, and high staff satisfaction.
Minimal
Patient experience pressure Dimension 4 / 5
Patient satisfaction is significantly below benchmark. Access, wait times, and experience are board-level concerns threatening volume.
Critical
Patient satisfaction is below target. Access issues and wait times are generating complaints and affecting referrals.
High
Patient experience is at benchmark. Meeting targets but with meaningful room for improvement.
Moderate
Patient experience is above average. We are proud of our scores and working to sustain them.
Low
Patient experience is a clear strength. We consistently outperform peers and have high patient loyalty.
Minimal
Regulatory & quality exposure Dimension 5 / 5
Active quality concerns — high readmission rates, CMS penalties, Joint Commission findings, or patient safety events demanding immediate attention.
Critical
Quality metrics below benchmark. At meaningful risk of CMS penalties or regulatory action.
High
Quality metrics at or near benchmark. Compliant but not exceptional and watching specific risk areas.
Moderate
Quality metrics above average. Good safety record and in good standing with regulators.
Low
Quality is a clear organizational strength. Recognized leader in safety and outcomes.
Minimal
⚠ Please answer all five dimensions before continuing.